.

Post Reply
twofoot
Posts: 105
Joined: May 4th, 2007, 2:19 pm

.

Post by twofoot »

.
Last edited by twofoot on July 19th, 2011, 10:24 pm, edited 1 time in total.
problemchild
Posts: 901
Joined: June 25th, 2006, 9:34 am

Re: Could this be our future?

Post by problemchild »

Careful ..... we don't want people thinking about nasty things like spec tires, BJ beams, disc brakes, and 1600 engines.

Shhhhh...... :lol:

And don't look here to see if there are similiar cars in America ... http://www.sugargrovecars.com/FormulaFirstM5.html
Greg Rice
"Happy 50th Birthday"
twofoot
Posts: 105
Joined: May 4th, 2007, 2:19 pm

.

Post by twofoot »

.
Last edited by twofoot on July 19th, 2011, 10:24 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Bill_Bonow
Posts: 301
Joined: June 26th, 2006, 12:53 pm

Re: Could this be our future?

Post by Bill_Bonow »

Chris,

Not sure if your post was meant to be tongue in cheek, but those "dreamy" cars have been racing in SCCA for the past 5 years. We just call it Formula First. Our rules were adapted directly from the Australian CAMS rules.

Here is the Jacer you posted
[ external image ]

And here I am in a Jacer at Grattan in '04
[ external image ]

Same car, different wheel and tires.

The only proven (ARRC winner '08) production (12 cars to date) Formula First car is the Evolution http://www.evolutionfst.com

If you were just yanking our chain about Formula First, well, you got me. If not, try these http://first.formulavee.org/exchange/
http://www.apexspeed.com/
http://www.formula-first.org/

Plenty of info available about this established class.
Bill Bonow
" I love Formula Vees, they're delicious!"
Post Reply