REM treatment for transmissions

Post Reply
brian
Posts: 1348
Joined: June 26th, 2006, 12:31 pm

REM treatment for transmissions

Post by brian »

Every once in a while I hear about someone wanting to use the REM tumbling treatment to polish their transmission gears. Several of the tranny builders have agreed that it is illegal for vees because it is removing material and therefore forbidden. What does the committee think of this issue?
The above post is for reference only and your results may vary. This post is not intended to reflect the views or opinions of SCCA and should not be considered an analysis or opinion of the rules written in the GCR.
hardingfv32-1
Posts: 1014
Joined: December 1st, 2006, 8:01 pm

Re: REM treatment for transmissions

Post by hardingfv32-1 »

What is there to think about, the rules are clear as written.

Now, if you were to mask all but the wear surfaces to prevent removal from the restricted areas, what would be wrong with that? Is it OK to use diamond dust in your oil to polish the matting surfaces?

Regardless of your opinion, how are you going to tell what was done?

Brian
D Rader
Posts: 12
Joined: January 19th, 2011, 5:37 pm

Re: REM treatment for transmissions

Post by D Rader »

Any Type of pollishing Is removing metal, Deburing a new gear is removing metal, Radiusing edges on axle ends is removing metal. How far do you want it to go? Just something to think about. Dale.
brian
Posts: 1348
Joined: June 26th, 2006, 12:31 pm

Re: REM treatment for transmissions

Post by brian »

I really don't think polishing helps that much but don't want the racing monkeys to convince us we have to have it cause it's quite costly. Unlike some classes where REM is used, our trannies have a lot of miles on them and are well bedded in. Back cutting and lightening may bring benefits but are clearly illegal. So is oil relieving the gears. Anyone can tell when a tranny has been polished or run in with abrasives, the gears are very shiny and the machine marks are all gone.
The above post is for reference only and your results may vary. This post is not intended to reflect the views or opinions of SCCA and should not be considered an analysis or opinion of the rules written in the GCR.
hardingfv32-1
Posts: 1014
Joined: December 1st, 2006, 8:01 pm

Re: REM treatment for transmissions

Post by hardingfv32-1 »

"Anyone can tell when a tranny has been polished or run in with abrasives, the gears are very shiny and the machine marks are all gone."

And the machine marks are not gone after 2-3 hundred thousand miles? You cannot control polishing using abrasives in the transmission fluid. Once the polishing is done you will switch bearings and replace the fluid so it is not like you are going to see anything in the oil.

Brian
D Rader
Posts: 12
Joined: January 19th, 2011, 5:37 pm

Re: REM treatment for transmissions

Post by D Rader »

Helical cut gears, generaly do not benefit very much from polishing, like straight cut gears will. The Gears want to "walk" on the shaft, away from each other, without some sort of "bite". This will cause excessive drag on the thrust bearing/washers on the end of the shafts. This shows up almost immediately in spot tempratures on the dyno, with almost no reduction in drag. My experience with REM coating is no real reduction in drag, but substantialy lower tempratures. I don't really understand how you can have lower tempratures, with no reduction in drag, but I've seen it happen. I've seen a REM coated box (a big hewland, not a vee trans.) run an entire session completely dry with gears coming out looking almost new (no hot spots, or visible damage) I would'nt re-use them, but it was very surprising, and impressive. In my opinion both pollishing, and REM coating are not worth the expense in our transmissions. Dale.
Post Reply